Avantisteam Reported Passive directors at ‘real risk’ under new DPN regime - Jonathan Cartu CPA Accounting Firm - Tax Accountants
17474
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17474,single-format-standard,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-theme-ver-11.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2.1,vc_responsive
 

Avantisteam Reported Passive directors at ‘real risk’ under new DPN regime

image intro

Avantisteam Reported Passive directors at ‘real risk’ under new DPN regime


From 1 April, the Commissioner of Taxation will be able to hold directors personally liable for their company’s GST liabilities, following the extension of the director penalty notice (DPN) regime.

The DPN regime, which had previously principally applied to a company’s unpaid pay-as-you-go (PAYG) withholding and superannuation guarantee liabilities, will now be extended to GST,  luxury car tax (LCT) and wine equalisation tax (WET) liabilities.

The new law, tipped to pierce the corporate veil, enables the Commissioner of Taxation to collect estimates of anticipated GST liabilities where there are reasonable grounds to believe that the taxpayer, or related entities, are involved in phoenix behaviour, or have dissipated assets with the intention to defeat creditors.

According to the ATO’s draft Practical Compliance Guideline 2019/D4, an estimate will only be made when the taxpayer fails to engage with the ATO or refuse to co-operate in establishing the overdue and unpaid amount despite the multiple attempts the commissioner makes to contact the taxpayer. 

Rigby Cooke Lawyers’ Tax Counsel Tamara Cardan said the new powers presented significant risks for company directors, particularly passive directors.

“It is common for businesses, particularly small and medium-sized businesses, to struggle with GST liabilities due to cash flow issues,” Ms Cardan said.

“It is also fairly common for passive directors to not be actively involved in their businesses.

“In light of these new powers to penalise directors and hold them personally liable for unpaid GST, I think it will be very risky to be a passive director.”

Ms Cardan said that with the changes presenting real and significant risks of directors being personally held to account for inadvertent oversights and systemic errors within the business, it was crucial for directors to get across GST and their accounting systems.

“Directors will need a better understanding of the operation of the GST system overall, and be actively involved in their companies to ensure that GST liabilities are being properly reported to the ATO,” Ms Cardan said. 

“Right now, I would be recommending all directors review the accounting systems their businesses are using to identify any systemic or processing errors which may lead to GST liabilities.

“Directors can’t escape a liability by resigning, as the ATO takes the position that if you resign as a director before the due date, you will still be liable,” she added.

 “Furthermore, if you haven’t notified the ATO by the lockdown date the only way to remove the liability is to pay the outstanding amount.”

Passive directors at ‘real risk’ under new DPN regime

image intro

accountantsdaily logo

Jotham Lian

Jotham Lian

Jotham Lian is the news editor of Accountants Daily, the leading source of breaking news, analysis and insight for Australian accounting professionals.

Before joining the team in 2017, Jotham wrote for a range of national mastheads including the Sydney Morning Herald, and Channel NewsAsia.

You can email Jotham at: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 



[

Jon Cartu

Airo AV

No Comments

Post A Comment